Source inbox
Capture first, but keep every item tied to its original URL or origin. This is intake—not evidence approval.
Free · No email required
A six-zone operating blueprint for source-led research, content, and reusable context—plus the brief that tells the board when it is finished.
The board architecture
The zones are intentionally simple. Their job is to preserve provenance and make disagreement visible—not to decorate the canvas.
Capture first, but keep every item tied to its original URL or origin. This is intake—not evidence approval.
Move only material that supports or materially changes the board’s decision. Attach the claim it supports.
Keep conflicting evidence, poor-fit cases, unknowns, and date-sensitive behavior visible instead of editing them out.
Separate direct observation, sourced fact, and inference. Conclusions stay provisional until the evidence review closes.
Freeze the statements that downstream scripts, newsletters, videos, and pages are allowed to use.
Build deliverables from the approved claim set so derivative content cannot quietly rewrite the conclusion.
POPPY BOARD OPERATING BRIEF BOARD OUTCOME What decision or deliverable should this board make possible? AUDIENCE Who will use the output, and what do they already understand? DEFINITION OF DONE What observable artifact or decision closes this board? EXCLUSIONS What attractive but unsupported claims will this board not make? 01 — SOURCE INBOX Unprocessed material. Every item keeps its original URL or origin. 02 — PRIMARY EVIDENCE Sources and direct observations that materially support the decision. 03 — CONTRADICTIONS + LIMITS Conflicting evidence, poor-fit cases, open questions, and date-sensitive behavior. 04 — WORKING CONCLUSIONS Interpretations under review. Label each as observation, sourced fact, or inference. 05 — APPROVED CLAIMS Statements cleared for the final deliverable, with provenance and important qualifications. 06 — OUTPUTS Scripts, briefs, tutorials, newsletters, or handoff packages built from the approved claims. REVIEW GATE Can a new operator state the question, find the evidence, see unresolved risks, and identify the approved output without a private tour?
Before collecting
State the board outcome, audience, definition of done, and excluded claims. If a new source does not support, limit, or change that outcome, it does not belong in this board.
Before publishing
A capable person should be able to identify the question, distinguish evidence from interpretation, see open risks, and locate approved claims without a private explanation.
Ready to build it?
We may earn a commission if you purchase through this link. The blueprint and verdict do not change because of that relationship.