Commercial research · 2026-07-15
Commercial research without fake affiliate claims
Finding a vendor program is not the same as joining it. The catalog needed to show commercial opportunity research without turning eligibility, outreach, or a public application page into a claimed partnership.
01 · What changed
The implementation move.
- 01Added statuses for active programs, eligibility-gated creator routes, partner-only programs, developer or testing access, closed programs, unverified terms, vendor outreach, no public program, and owned products.
- 02Surfaced commercial status in tool profiles, directory search, and machine-readable exports.
- 03Kept commission rates and portal-only terms out of public copy when the approved source must control them.
- 04Preserved the controlled Poppy destination behind one auditable route.
02 · Evidence
What supports the current claim.
- Every tool record has exactly one commercial-research record.
- Tests cover representative active, closed, and no-public-program cases.
- The affiliate flag remains limited to the existing Poppy relationship rather than every discovered program.
03 · What I learned
The reusable lesson.
04 · Security and control impact
How the authority or release boundary changed.
- Commercial research and editorial conclusions remain separate data concerns.
- Owned products receive an ownership disclosure rather than an affiliate label.
- No ranking, score, urgency, or positive conclusion can be purchased.
Current limitationCommercial programs, terms, and availability change. A researched status still requires date-aware review before a reader relies on it.
Next decisionCarry the same relationship labels into founder project pages, build logs, sponsored material, and future Skool promotion.
Related records